Speeches published in Policy Options

I have very much been enjoying the publication of excerpts of speeches in Policy Options, the learned magazine of Institute for Research in Public Policy (IRPP). Three come to mind, being those given by President Obama, Senator Segal and Prime Minister Harper. I am quite aware that these likely involved speech writers, but nevertheless seeing the source material helps to understand where these speakers are coming from. President Obama´s speech in Egypt was brilliant, and reading it helped to understand why it would be considered as part of why he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Senator Segal was very articulate and insightful. A wonderful suggestion to the media as to how they can improve their reporting. Regretably the speech of Prime Minister Harper at Davos was intellectually light in my opinion. I like the concept of enlightened sovereignty that he espoused but the speech described action and labelled it. It was not persuasive as it did not philosophically build a case for this type of sovereign action and then say this is what its execution would include. I suspect that is the difference between a stateman and a politican.

A Radical Thought

About twelve days ago there was an article in the New York Times about the cost of the Internet, TV and phone (including long distance) in the USA. The columnist pointed out that the cost of this bundle in France was US$30 per month. This was because they share the infrastructure and there is much competition. He was complaining of the high cost in the USA. He should check it out in Canada! We have far less competition in this area and less sharing of the costly infrastructure. The various companies are laying their own infrastructure and / or minimally sharing it. This has duplicated costs and created much redundancy. So generally I would be against government getting involved in this fashion, but I´m thinking this is a case where it would be for the greater good for government to nationalize the infrastructure, to have it run either by government or an efficient entrepreneurial third party, and make it available to all the service providers. The cost of infrastructure would thus not be a barrier to entry into the market. We could have more competition and lower cost. Wider access would be a huge benefit to education, business, Canadian society and our economy generally.