I interrupted the main book I’ve been reading lately (Cryptonomicon) to read “Uncle Petros and Goldbach’s Conjecture”. It is by Apostolos Doxiadis, translated from Greek by the author. The author is a mathematician and the subject matter is the struggle of a mathematician, Uncle Petros, to prove an unproven proposition – Goldbach’s Conjecture – viz. according to the author, every even number greater than 2 is the sum of two prime numbers. It seems though that the real Goldbach conjecture, written in 1742 states "that every number that is greater than 2 is the sum of three primes". Maybe something got lost in Doxiadis’ translation, or he just included this as part of this fiction? It was a delightful light read, most interesting, and a wonderful diversion. Ok, I have to admit too that the fact the author was Greek (a major part of my ethnic heritage) and the subject matter was mathematics (my original post-secondary academic love) drew me to this book. I was also intrigued by the staircase design on the cover which was drawn in a depiction of what I’ve normally seen fractals represented as. There are two levels to the story.
First, there is the mathematics. Not the number crunching, calculation type of math. It’s described in the book as grocery bill math. Neither is it the equational type of math you think of in algebra or calculus. Rather it is about types of math, whether it be logic, universal algebra, number theory, etc. being used as tools to solve complex mathematical hypotheses. So in a sense it is what I would describe as meta-math – math about math. It really is looking at it from a different level. That really stretched my mind because my studies never got to that level. I was still back at the learning the tools stage: calculus, logic, set theory, modern geometry, universal algebra, etc. Would have been fun to get to that next stage!
The second level is the human story of the quest of Uncle Petros. He works hard. He makes the mistake of not sharing his intermediate results which would have been considered ground breaking and worthy of notable publication. He seems on the verge of solving it. But then he gets negative feedback from well placed colleagues. He retires to the family property in Greece, shunning the scientific world. He interacts with a nephew who Uncle Petros tries to dissuade from becoming a mathematician. That eventually succeeds and the nephew studies business, after doing an initial degree in math. Later he draws out his uncle, who we are lead to believe discovers the solution, but dies of a stroke before the proof is documented. Tragic. Some side stories of family relations. I really felt the Greek family celebrations. Touching stories too of two brothers of Uncle Petros who run the family business and support Uncle Petros financially. Should one pursue one’s dreams? Should one be practical and support one-self? Should he have given up on the basis that the Conjecture was unproveable, or persevered?
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
General Rick Hillier’s Talk on “Managing Risk in Turbulent Times”
At a breakfast this morning sponsored by Gowling’s, General Rick Hillier, a consultant to that firm, and former Chief of Canada’s Defence Staff, spoke on “Managing Risk in Turbulent Times”. Most of the talk really related to leadership. He is a very rousing and dynamic speaker, but not as militaristic as one might assume. And I think that was part of the message. To be a leader you really need to pay attention to the human side; to relationships.
As for risk management, he talked of deciding is something is worth the risks, if you are going to do something. That’s trite, but I wonder if we do this as often as we should. Seems to me that in whatever we are deciding, we often make the decision to forge ahead based on whether we think it is a good idea. We want that desired result to increase revenue, decrease expenses, gain market share, etc. But have we really thought about the risks of doing it, and I would suggest just as importantly the risks of not doing it. Bottom line: more expansive thought should go into decision making.
But back to General Hillier’s remarks: He told of a situation in which he and his wife, and a lot of troops, were travelling in a new transport to the Canadian military. Big sucker! They were coming into Afghanistan. The aircraft, despite its size, is designed to come in quickly for a landing. Not a long, slow glide so that it will be a target for group launched rockets. So it goes from 27,000 feet to 1200 feet in about 1 minute 30 seconds. He said quite a sensation. He was a little worried because the US Major piloting the plane looked like he hadn’t started shaving yet. During the descent his wife screamed “We’re going down.”’ His response was: yes, we’re going down but it’s a controlled descent. “controlled descent”! Good analogy to our sometimes engage in dramatic changes, but hopefully being mindful that we should be in control as they proceed. Another way to manage risk.
He had a saying: no (something), no fads. Sorry, but I can’t remember what “(something)” was – it was an early morning after a wonderful evening of a dinner with Stikeman Elliott. The concept was though that one should avoid preconceptions and the “flavour du jour”. He told the story of an Inuit soldier who was 4 foot 6, but was the best in training soldiers in the Arctic. He could do amazing things. But on seeing his size you would assume that he could not do big things. One story was about how he talked a polar bear out of their camp. The same applied to the above story of the pilot. Don’t assume because of his youth that he was unable to execute the ability to control and expedite a landing which had all the potential for disastrous results. The “fads” part spoke so much to me. In management literature we see so much of this. When you really get to the bottom of it, a lot is fads, or repackaged basic principles that we’ve read about before.
But it was General Hillier’s connection with his people that spoke the most to me. He talked of his knowledge of his operational staff but also of the injured and their families. He had met them. He had taken the time to talk to them. He had done little things for them, that meant so much to them. He had grieved with the families of those who had given their lives. He helped a widow carry on the work that her husband, a medic, whose nickname was Boomer, had done with the people of Afghanistan. The work was often with children to help to prolong their lives. The rates of child mortality are high. Part of it was a very touching story of toques which were knitted for the kids to wear to prevent the loss of body heat. Apparently this is a real problem which leads to many unnecessary deaths. The widow arranged for Canadians to knits thousands of these toques, which are called “Boomers”, and the General facilitated their distribution. Not something you would think a busy General would have time to do. But it was important to him. And I think an important element of his leadership.
He has a book coming out October 24 and apparently the pre-orders are sold out, and it is like #5 on amazon.ca’s best pre-sellers list. Based on what I heard, it could very well be an interesting read. At a breakfast this morning sponsored by Gowling’s, General Rick Hillier, a consultant to that firm, and former Chief of Canada’s Defence Staff, spoke on “Managing Risk in Turbulent Times”. Most of the talk really related to leadership. He is a very rousing and dynamic speaker, but not as militaristic as one might assume. And I think that was part of the message. To be a leader you really need to pay attention to the human side; to relationships.
As for risk management, he talked of deciding if something is worth the risks, if you are going to do something. That’s trite, but I wonder if we do this as often as we should. Seems to me that in whatever we are deciding, we often make the decision to forge ahead based on whether we think it is a good idea. We want that desired result to increase revenue, decrease expenses, gain market share, etc. But have we really thought about the risks of doing it, and I would suggest just as importantly the risks of not doing it. Bottom line: more expansive thought should go into decision making.
But back to General Hillier’s remarks: He told of a situation in which he and his wife, and a lot of troops, were travelling in a new transport to the Canadian military. Big sucker of an airplane! They were coming into Afghanistan. The aircraft, despite its size, is designed to come in quickly for a landing. Not a long, slow glide so that it will be a target for ground launched rockets. So it goes from 27,000 feet to 1200 feet in about 1 minute 30 seconds. He said quite a sensation. He was a little worried because the US Major piloting the plane looked like he hadn’t started shaving yet. During the descent his wife screamed “We’re going down.”’ His response was: yes, we’re going down but it’s a controlled descent. “controlled descent”! Good analogy to our sometimes being engaged in dramatic changes, but hopefully being mindful that we should be in control as they proceed. Another way to manage risk.
He had a saying: no (something), no fads. Sorry, but I can’t remember what “(something)” was – it was an early morning after a wonderful evening of a dinner with Stikeman Elliott. The concept was though that one should avoid preconceptions and the “flavour du jour”. He told the story of an Inuit soldier who was 4 foot 6, but was the best in training soldiers in the Arctic. He could do amazing things. But on seeing his size you would assume that he could not do big things. One story was about how he talked a polar bear out of their camp. The same applied to the above story of the pilot. Don’t assume because of his youth that he was unable to execute the ability to control and expedite a landing which had all the potential for disastrous results. The “fads” part spoke so much to me. In management literature we see so much of this. When you really get to the bottom of it a lot is fads are repackaged basic principles that we’ve read about before.
But it was General Hillier’s connection with his people that spoke the most to me. He talked of his knowledge of his operational staff but also of the injured and their families. He had met them. He had taken the time to talk to them. He had done little things for them, that meant so much to them. He had grieved with the families of those who had given their lives. He helped a widow carry on the work that her husband, a medic, whose nickname was Boomer, had done with the people of Afghanistan. The work was often with children to help to prolong their lives. The rates of child mortality are high. Part of it was a very touching story of toques which were knitted for the kids to wear to prevent the loss of body heat. Apparently this is a real problem which leads to many unnecessary deaths. The widow of the Canadian soldier arranged for Canadians to knit thousands of these toques, which are called “Boomers”, and the General facilitated their distribution. Not something you would think a busy General would have time to do. But it was important to him. And I think an important element of his leadership.
He has a book coming out October 24 and apparently the pre-orders are sold out, and it is like #5 on amazon.ca’s best pre-sellers list. Based on what I heard, it could very well be an interesting read.
As for risk management, he talked of deciding is something is worth the risks, if you are going to do something. That’s trite, but I wonder if we do this as often as we should. Seems to me that in whatever we are deciding, we often make the decision to forge ahead based on whether we think it is a good idea. We want that desired result to increase revenue, decrease expenses, gain market share, etc. But have we really thought about the risks of doing it, and I would suggest just as importantly the risks of not doing it. Bottom line: more expansive thought should go into decision making.
But back to General Hillier’s remarks: He told of a situation in which he and his wife, and a lot of troops, were travelling in a new transport to the Canadian military. Big sucker! They were coming into Afghanistan. The aircraft, despite its size, is designed to come in quickly for a landing. Not a long, slow glide so that it will be a target for group launched rockets. So it goes from 27,000 feet to 1200 feet in about 1 minute 30 seconds. He said quite a sensation. He was a little worried because the US Major piloting the plane looked like he hadn’t started shaving yet. During the descent his wife screamed “We’re going down.”’ His response was: yes, we’re going down but it’s a controlled descent. “controlled descent”! Good analogy to our sometimes engage in dramatic changes, but hopefully being mindful that we should be in control as they proceed. Another way to manage risk.
He had a saying: no (something), no fads. Sorry, but I can’t remember what “(something)” was – it was an early morning after a wonderful evening of a dinner with Stikeman Elliott. The concept was though that one should avoid preconceptions and the “flavour du jour”. He told the story of an Inuit soldier who was 4 foot 6, but was the best in training soldiers in the Arctic. He could do amazing things. But on seeing his size you would assume that he could not do big things. One story was about how he talked a polar bear out of their camp. The same applied to the above story of the pilot. Don’t assume because of his youth that he was unable to execute the ability to control and expedite a landing which had all the potential for disastrous results. The “fads” part spoke so much to me. In management literature we see so much of this. When you really get to the bottom of it, a lot is fads, or repackaged basic principles that we’ve read about before.
But it was General Hillier’s connection with his people that spoke the most to me. He talked of his knowledge of his operational staff but also of the injured and their families. He had met them. He had taken the time to talk to them. He had done little things for them, that meant so much to them. He had grieved with the families of those who had given their lives. He helped a widow carry on the work that her husband, a medic, whose nickname was Boomer, had done with the people of Afghanistan. The work was often with children to help to prolong their lives. The rates of child mortality are high. Part of it was a very touching story of toques which were knitted for the kids to wear to prevent the loss of body heat. Apparently this is a real problem which leads to many unnecessary deaths. The widow arranged for Canadians to knits thousands of these toques, which are called “Boomers”, and the General facilitated their distribution. Not something you would think a busy General would have time to do. But it was important to him. And I think an important element of his leadership.
He has a book coming out October 24 and apparently the pre-orders are sold out, and it is like #5 on amazon.ca’s best pre-sellers list. Based on what I heard, it could very well be an interesting read. At a breakfast this morning sponsored by Gowling’s, General Rick Hillier, a consultant to that firm, and former Chief of Canada’s Defence Staff, spoke on “Managing Risk in Turbulent Times”. Most of the talk really related to leadership. He is a very rousing and dynamic speaker, but not as militaristic as one might assume. And I think that was part of the message. To be a leader you really need to pay attention to the human side; to relationships.
As for risk management, he talked of deciding if something is worth the risks, if you are going to do something. That’s trite, but I wonder if we do this as often as we should. Seems to me that in whatever we are deciding, we often make the decision to forge ahead based on whether we think it is a good idea. We want that desired result to increase revenue, decrease expenses, gain market share, etc. But have we really thought about the risks of doing it, and I would suggest just as importantly the risks of not doing it. Bottom line: more expansive thought should go into decision making.
But back to General Hillier’s remarks: He told of a situation in which he and his wife, and a lot of troops, were travelling in a new transport to the Canadian military. Big sucker of an airplane! They were coming into Afghanistan. The aircraft, despite its size, is designed to come in quickly for a landing. Not a long, slow glide so that it will be a target for ground launched rockets. So it goes from 27,000 feet to 1200 feet in about 1 minute 30 seconds. He said quite a sensation. He was a little worried because the US Major piloting the plane looked like he hadn’t started shaving yet. During the descent his wife screamed “We’re going down.”’ His response was: yes, we’re going down but it’s a controlled descent. “controlled descent”! Good analogy to our sometimes being engaged in dramatic changes, but hopefully being mindful that we should be in control as they proceed. Another way to manage risk.
He had a saying: no (something), no fads. Sorry, but I can’t remember what “(something)” was – it was an early morning after a wonderful evening of a dinner with Stikeman Elliott. The concept was though that one should avoid preconceptions and the “flavour du jour”. He told the story of an Inuit soldier who was 4 foot 6, but was the best in training soldiers in the Arctic. He could do amazing things. But on seeing his size you would assume that he could not do big things. One story was about how he talked a polar bear out of their camp. The same applied to the above story of the pilot. Don’t assume because of his youth that he was unable to execute the ability to control and expedite a landing which had all the potential for disastrous results. The “fads” part spoke so much to me. In management literature we see so much of this. When you really get to the bottom of it a lot is fads are repackaged basic principles that we’ve read about before.
But it was General Hillier’s connection with his people that spoke the most to me. He talked of his knowledge of his operational staff but also of the injured and their families. He had met them. He had taken the time to talk to them. He had done little things for them, that meant so much to them. He had grieved with the families of those who had given their lives. He helped a widow carry on the work that her husband, a medic, whose nickname was Boomer, had done with the people of Afghanistan. The work was often with children to help to prolong their lives. The rates of child mortality are high. Part of it was a very touching story of toques which were knitted for the kids to wear to prevent the loss of body heat. Apparently this is a real problem which leads to many unnecessary deaths. The widow of the Canadian soldier arranged for Canadians to knit thousands of these toques, which are called “Boomers”, and the General facilitated their distribution. Not something you would think a busy General would have time to do. But it was important to him. And I think an important element of his leadership.
He has a book coming out October 24 and apparently the pre-orders are sold out, and it is like #5 on amazon.ca’s best pre-sellers list. Based on what I heard, it could very well be an interesting read.
Monday, October 19, 2009
Luncheon Speaker - Doris Kearns Goodwin on "Team of Rivals"
Very interesting luncheon speaker at the conference today. She is Doris Kearns Goodwin, a historian and Pulitzer Prize winning author. I haven’t read any of her books, but she was speaking today on her book, Team of Rivals – the story of Abraham Lincoln.
She had spent 5 years I think it was pouring through letters and diaries to come up with a fascinating work, about an extraordinary man. She bemoaned the fact that in our age of electronic communications, such sources as she used will not be available. Is anyone keeping the electronic media of great people?
She told fascinating stories of Lincoln’s leadership, how he got the Republican (I guess that was before that party got a bad name!) nomination for president (he beat the clear favourite, who was so confident he spent the 9 months before the nomination travelling Europe, on the third ballot; how he brought his fiercest opponents into his cabinet, even listened to them, but once he decided they had to fall into line (e.g. when he decided to issue the Emancipation Proclamation there would be no more debate on whether it would be issued, but he would hear them on timing and implementation matters); how notwithstanding being treated rudely by some of these opponents he took the high road (e.g. forgiving them or not stooping to the same level of politics) [wouldn’t that be refreshing in 21st century politics!]; if someone was not doing their job how he would create an imaginary line (of time) by which if they did not do it they would be fired (he did this with a general during the Civil War); and his great ability for story telling (which I think is a great way to mentor and instil values).
But alas the book is way too long (900 pages) to keep my attention – my jaws would get way too sore from sounding out all those words! So once again I passed up buying a book at this convention (the last one was by the physicist who spoke on string theory) and having the author sign it. But come to think of that length, my current read is Crytonomicon, which is about 1000 pages – but it’s math, not history. More on that though when I finish it.
She had spent 5 years I think it was pouring through letters and diaries to come up with a fascinating work, about an extraordinary man. She bemoaned the fact that in our age of electronic communications, such sources as she used will not be available. Is anyone keeping the electronic media of great people?
She told fascinating stories of Lincoln’s leadership, how he got the Republican (I guess that was before that party got a bad name!) nomination for president (he beat the clear favourite, who was so confident he spent the 9 months before the nomination travelling Europe, on the third ballot; how he brought his fiercest opponents into his cabinet, even listened to them, but once he decided they had to fall into line (e.g. when he decided to issue the Emancipation Proclamation there would be no more debate on whether it would be issued, but he would hear them on timing and implementation matters); how notwithstanding being treated rudely by some of these opponents he took the high road (e.g. forgiving them or not stooping to the same level of politics) [wouldn’t that be refreshing in 21st century politics!]; if someone was not doing their job how he would create an imaginary line (of time) by which if they did not do it they would be fired (he did this with a general during the Civil War); and his great ability for story telling (which I think is a great way to mentor and instil values).
But alas the book is way too long (900 pages) to keep my attention – my jaws would get way too sore from sounding out all those words! So once again I passed up buying a book at this convention (the last one was by the physicist who spoke on string theory) and having the author sign it. But come to think of that length, my current read is Crytonomicon, which is about 1000 pages – but it’s math, not history. More on that though when I finish it.
Going to Boston October 18, 2009 for Association of Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting
I'm on my way to Boston for a conference of the Association of Corporate Counsel, an international association based in USA. The prospect of spending 3 days with about 3500 in-house counsel doesn't really appeal to me, except that the education sessions are fantastic. Definitely in the top couple of what I have experienced. Not only do they concentrate on what is important to general counsel, but they also recognize that general counsel often have responsibilities as corporate secretaries. So lots of sessions on that too. The most interesting title of one session I attended a couple of years ago was "The Care and Feeding of your Board of Directors". How true - definitly a relationship side to those things, not just the formal support. Have to admit that there are a few counsel who I enjoy seeing. Not sure of the luncheon speakers this year. At my first such conference there was a top USA physicist who spoke on string theory. Was fantastic! I even understood it, given his approach and slides. However 30 minutes later if I tried to explain it, I'm sure I turned into a babbling idiot! First trip to Boston, so I'm looking forward to that too.
LEAF, Manitoba Chapter, Person's Day Breakfast, October 16, 2009
Attended the LEAF Annual Person’s Day Breakfast this morning. Was very well attended at about 1000. Yah! Prof. Kathleen Mahoney spoke. When I’ve thought of equality I’ve always considered it meant that you had to treat people the same. But she said, sometimes you have to treat people differently, presumably not to discriminate against them. That really spoke to me. Treat people differently, to treat them the same. Makes sense if you consider a pregnant woman in the workplace. You may have to treat her differently in order to get her to the same point as you would treat a man. Then former AFN Chief Phil Fontaine spoke. He spoke of the residential school situation. When I grew up in Brandon I attended the United Church and a number of the children (probably aged 6-16) attended from the Indian Residential School. They were tremendously bad behaved. Would never sit still. Would run all over the place. We always thought that they were just badly behaved. After listening to Chief Fontaine I had a new perspective – maybe they were just acting out because of how they were being treated at the Indian Residential School, or because they had been forced away from their family and were being forced to assimilate into “white” society. Put it in a whole different light. Maybe we should be more tolerant of bad situations and try to understand the causes rather than jump to conclusions about the obvious.
A friend had commented to me: Both speeches were very absolutely inspiring! I was impressed with Phil Fontaine's message about balance and his increible presence as a healer. The LEAF breakfasts are always thought provoking!
I too was impressed with Phil Fontaine's message and his delivery. She hit it right on the head in describing him as a healer. I previously had the idea from media reports over the years that he was more militant. However that was certainly not the message he portrayed at the breakfast. I also like how he talked about the good things that were done by some Indian Residential Schools. I had no idea about that. Should I have read more, or was it just not reported? I hope it is not a cop out, but I am of the view that sometimes the media publishes the extreme points in order to garner interest in buying papers, watching tv news reports, etc. That unfortunately leaves the positive parts of the story out.
A friend had commented to me: Both speeches were very absolutely inspiring! I was impressed with Phil Fontaine's message about balance and his increible presence as a healer. The LEAF breakfasts are always thought provoking!
I too was impressed with Phil Fontaine's message and his delivery. She hit it right on the head in describing him as a healer. I previously had the idea from media reports over the years that he was more militant. However that was certainly not the message he portrayed at the breakfast. I also like how he talked about the good things that were done by some Indian Residential Schools. I had no idea about that. Should I have read more, or was it just not reported? I hope it is not a cop out, but I am of the view that sometimes the media publishes the extreme points in order to garner interest in buying papers, watching tv news reports, etc. That unfortunately leaves the positive parts of the story out.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Cottage Closing / Being Marooned Adventure
Arrived Friday (October 9) 630 pm at our wee cottage in the woods ( 20 min drive NE of Town of Lac du Bonnet, Manitoba). It was going to -7 C. so had to go out to the cottage to protect the water pipes. Cottage is not insulated, has 2 area heaters and a wood stove. So it's basically like heating a tent. Made my notes for my Facebook posts with pencil as pen ink was not fluid! Got the cottage warmed by 930 after Tasha made cookies so the heat of the stove would help to heat cottage. Such a nice thing to a mid-teen daughter to do.Overnight it would likely be not bad if someone got up to re-stock the wood stove. Didn't happen. Tasha is in a contained room with a space heater. No way she'll leave that warmth! We're in the open loft - it's an "A" frame cottage. My strategy was to drink enough wine that I would sleep through the night and not notice the cold. So it was indeed cold Saturday morning. One final note - the only way to survive this cold is for me to cover my head while I sleep. I brought my bright red Festival du Voyageur toque. Wore it all night. Wendy hates it. Guess I should have brought the yellow toque! Lol. Her parting comment as I drifted off was that I'd be hearing from her solicitor. Struck me that that would mean I would be talking to myself!By Saturday at 11 am there was at least 20 cm of heavy wet snow on the ground and it was still coming down. No one had been down the road by the cottage yet. At least we're safe. But won't have enough wine! So much for closing the cottage and getting back to Winnipeg today!
We could have waited out the storm, but hadn't brought any books to read as I thought I would just be in and out to do the closing. Still snowing Saturday late afternoon. I did do some of the outside closing jobs. Not sure why I am punishing myself! The electricity is blinking on and off a bit. Where are those Cdn Forces helicopters that make unscheduled stops for burgers when you want one? I'm in the mood for a delivered pizza and red wine to enjoy in front of the wood stove!
By the end of Saturday afternoon I finished all the outside jobs I'm going to do. Still snowing Saturday evening. 16 inches so far. Went for a walk and took shortcut through the woods. Snow up to my knees in lots of places.
Sunday at about midnight the hydro went out. Didn’t get restored till a bout 8:45 am. So much for the space heaters helping. Wendy and I took turns replenishing the wood stove. Wasn’t too bad but we didn’t feel very rested on Sunday. But it stopped snowing overnight. Some of the trees had snapped from the weight of the wet snow.
As I went out to shovel the driveway so that we could escape this madness, I thought that it was such a strange sight to see the deciduous trees still with their green leaves, but all around the trees was this thick blanket of white snow. Good news though: I won’t have to rake leaves at the cottage this fall. Bad news: they’ll be there in the spring. My best optimistic estimate is that given our last seasons in Manitoba, spring will likely come in July, 2010!!!
Got the driveway shovelled. Not much fun given how wet and heavy the snow was. Then we all finished the closing jobs. Left for home about 1 ish. Worst part was getting out of the development. There were just 2 tracks down the road, but there had been enough warmth so that those tracks were actually down to mud – it’s a gravel road. Came to the end of the avenue the cottage is on and was going to take a run through the piled up snow to get onto the main road, and then noticed that there was a fire truck with its emergency lights on coming down the road. They actually stopped and waved me through. Had to back up by then and take a run at it. It worked. Not sure what the fire truck was doing. Maybe packing down the snow so people could drive, at least until the municipal plows get out.
When we got on the highway we saw that the snow plows had been down and there had been enough warmth that the highway was bare. What a relief! As we drove towards Lac du Bonnet, and were about 10 km from the cottage as the crow flies, there was hardly any snow. No evidence of the road needing to be plowed. And as we got to Lac du Bonnet there was even less evidence of snow. Wendy was so right when she said it was like we had stepped out of winter, and into fall. So why us???? Why did we have to be on the other side of the bad weather!
Arrived home safely about 3:30 pm.
We could have waited out the storm, but hadn't brought any books to read as I thought I would just be in and out to do the closing. Still snowing Saturday late afternoon. I did do some of the outside closing jobs. Not sure why I am punishing myself! The electricity is blinking on and off a bit. Where are those Cdn Forces helicopters that make unscheduled stops for burgers when you want one? I'm in the mood for a delivered pizza and red wine to enjoy in front of the wood stove!
By the end of Saturday afternoon I finished all the outside jobs I'm going to do. Still snowing Saturday evening. 16 inches so far. Went for a walk and took shortcut through the woods. Snow up to my knees in lots of places.
Sunday at about midnight the hydro went out. Didn’t get restored till a bout 8:45 am. So much for the space heaters helping. Wendy and I took turns replenishing the wood stove. Wasn’t too bad but we didn’t feel very rested on Sunday. But it stopped snowing overnight. Some of the trees had snapped from the weight of the wet snow.
As I went out to shovel the driveway so that we could escape this madness, I thought that it was such a strange sight to see the deciduous trees still with their green leaves, but all around the trees was this thick blanket of white snow. Good news though: I won’t have to rake leaves at the cottage this fall. Bad news: they’ll be there in the spring. My best optimistic estimate is that given our last seasons in Manitoba, spring will likely come in July, 2010!!!
Got the driveway shovelled. Not much fun given how wet and heavy the snow was. Then we all finished the closing jobs. Left for home about 1 ish. Worst part was getting out of the development. There were just 2 tracks down the road, but there had been enough warmth so that those tracks were actually down to mud – it’s a gravel road. Came to the end of the avenue the cottage is on and was going to take a run through the piled up snow to get onto the main road, and then noticed that there was a fire truck with its emergency lights on coming down the road. They actually stopped and waved me through. Had to back up by then and take a run at it. It worked. Not sure what the fire truck was doing. Maybe packing down the snow so people could drive, at least until the municipal plows get out.
When we got on the highway we saw that the snow plows had been down and there had been enough warmth that the highway was bare. What a relief! As we drove towards Lac du Bonnet, and were about 10 km from the cottage as the crow flies, there was hardly any snow. No evidence of the road needing to be plowed. And as we got to Lac du Bonnet there was even less evidence of snow. Wendy was so right when she said it was like we had stepped out of winter, and into fall. So why us???? Why did we have to be on the other side of the bad weather!
Arrived home safely about 3:30 pm.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)